Tom Dixon Oil: Scented Candle as Decoration

Tom Dixon Oil: Scented Candle as Decoration


As a general rule, I like beautiful things better than I like ugly things. I’m somewhat puzzled by stuff that looks completely hideous: why make these things? Who buys them? Anyway, I shouldn’t get agitated. There are exceptions – I have only once bought a perfume just for the bottle and will happily spend money on the ugliest flacon if I love the scent. But when it comes to candles, I do think that looks are important – you don’t put them away in the drawers, to protect them from the light. At least while you are actively using them, they’ll be on display. As you have probably guessed, I’d rather display beautiful things.

Sometimes, inner and outer beauty coincide – Byredo Bibliotheque candle is a case in point. This Tom Dixon product, however, is not the most fantastic candle I’ve ever burned. Unlit and close up, it does smell very nice: woody, leathery, a bit smoky. But the throw is feeble, so if you actually want to smell it, I suggest burning it in a small room. Then again, who cares if it smells of anything, because LOOK AT IT.

The vessel is designed by Tom Dixon and made of mouth-blown glass and you can tell. It looks like petroleum on water, multi-coloured and absolutely beautiful, different in every light. Apparently, no candle looks the same. If you are one of those people who like to reuse candle jars, this will up your game in a major way. All those unfortunates, storing their cotton buds in their Diptyque containers? You can just smile at them with a mixture of generosity and condescension, as their lives are so empty compared to yours. Also, if you’re going to pay for a designer name, it might at least be a great designer who makes beautiful things (see paragraph one on the superiority of beautiful things).

Another not-very-widely known company that produces extremely good-looking candles is L’Objet. They go for classic French elegance and do it very successfully. I have never burned their candles, but I have smelled them in-store and I was impressed. The Russe and Jasmin d’Inde were my particular favourites. I’m sure I’ll get one soon, regardless of the actual performance.

Any recommendations for other pretty candles that don’t really work but look pretty? To aid me on my way to bankruptcy?

PS Doesn’t the title sound like a very bad academic paper? Something like “Beyonce’s Dancers: Race as Metaphor” or something?

8 Comments

Add yours
  1. 1
    Johanob

    Oh my goodness,you always(well mostly!)put a smile on my face or make me really laugh out loud with your quirky,fun posts!!I love this!My favorite candle is probably the cheapest,most fake-foul-smelling creation ever,by aircare “guru’s” Airwick.I love it so much,because it’s so kitsch and totally uncool actually!BUT,it’s gota built-in light that constantly changes color,and I can stare at that forever!!Lol!And then there are those Fornasetti ceramic holders…but that’s another collection-story for another day!X

    • 2
      Ykkinna

      Hahahaa, your Airwick sounds very camp? And I have been eyeing up the Fornasetties, but I must admit I don’t like most of them THAT much, although I’ve liked a few. One day… And thank you, of course!

  2. 3
    Neiumalin

    I am so happy reading this. I always have to justify myself when explaining people that “I cannot buy this laptop/phone/whatever since it is UGLY” I don`t see the meaning of buying ugly things even if they are really good performing well or whatever. I had to buy a laptop couple of months ago so I had endless discussions about my belief to not buy ugly things. Especially with like laptop/phone or other “long-term commitments” why should I just agree to purchase something that is performing well but does not make me smile when I look at it.
    People just do not get it. Especially men (My bf is convinced I am crazy)

    • 4
      Ykkinna

      I’m totally with you on this. Not that I wouldn’t use a thing that is, in my opinion, aesthetically sub-par or refuse to buy one if I truly need it and there are only ugly options. But if I can choose between a beautiful and ugly thing, why on earth would I pick the latter? And yes, I would pay extra, if need be. I’m not a fan of religion, but I have sympathy for the thought that
      “one should do everything as for God”. You wouldn’t make God something ugly, would you now? I mean, theoretically, a huge unornamented square building with some rough windows would have worked equally as the Cathedral in Reims. I say it’s irresponsible to knowingly multiply ugly things when you have other options.

      • 5
        Neiumalin

        My “religion” on buying pretty things is much more practical. I believe that if I buy myself a pretty phone/laptop then I will love it. By loving it I will be more careful with it and the thing will serve me longer because of all the love 🙂

  3. 7
    SophieC

    After a long week this is an uplifting and lighthearted post to read. I even drive the long way round to enjoy beauty and if wearing essentially a tracksuit try to make sure I at least thing it’s pretty or cute. On candles I have a delightful Tom Dixon candle, given as a generous gift, the name of which I cannot now remember, and it has the mot beautiful sort of white marble top (which you rest it on when it burns) that has s beautiful shimmer. It comes in a silver jar and it an object of beauty which sits in the middle of the table. The Cire Trudon carved ones are truly stunning but that is a whole different angle.

    • 8
      Ykkinna

      I love Cire Trudon as well – especially when they do other colours than the dark green, although that is beautiful too – but they are also good quality, so didn’t fit the theme that well:) I believe Selfridges carries some of the L’Objet candles: do take a look, if you haven’t yet. I think they are extremely elegant and would suit your style.

+ Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.